Same day as the other roll, but this with Tri-X Pan 320 expired in 1984 shot as ASA 50, I think Graham was right to start the counting from ASA 200 and one more stop down won't hurt. What do you think?
Also it went out more grainy than the other roll.
One question, if its shot as ASA 50 being ASA 320, the develop times should be as ASA 320 or 50? I say this because this time at the lab I wrote ASA 320 as the guys over there maybe don't know this film and its not written in the paper roll.
Thank you for watching.